1b and 1c - ''Factually accurate' means that claims are verifiable against reliable sources and accurately represent the relevant body of published knowledge.' - The article does not use the most reliable sources.That has not yet been reached here please find a good copy editor who has not worked on this article to review it. In the 'Themes' section (which I am happy to see has been added), for example, the editors have ignored all of the film criticism written by scholars on this film. 1d - There is a slight POV in this article.Thus the variety of interpretations of the film, the explanations of the film's meaning and a history of its iconographic status in American society are lost. Statements such as The film is a reflection of Steven Spielberg's childhood are POV. I tried looking up other sources, including one Bignole sent to me, but it was sheer rubbish.Awadewit | talk 23:45, 28 June 2007 (UTC) Reply 2d - 'consistently formatted inline citations' - The footnotes are not consistently cited.Spielberg should not be given priority here (see intentional fallacy). Nonetheless, I'll try to expand the themes section. I am not sure why you are saying that all of the film criticism on E.T.Alientraveller 09:42, 29 June 2007 (UTC) Reply But your POV accusation is bizzare, and I'll ignore it. is 'rubbish.' By the way, editors do not get choose what to include and what to ignore in such a broad fashion. The whole point of WP:NPOV and WP:ATT is that articles must represent the published opinions on the matter, not the editors' opinions.

#Will amok dvd shrinker 1.50 work on windows 8.1 professional#.

Amok dvd shrinker 1.40